Publishing Monday, part deux: Book advances — what’s the deal?

How much should a book advance be? Traditional publishing wisdom states that advances should cover what a book is expected to earn in author royalties for the book’s first year of publication. An example: Let’s say your publisher expects to sell 10,000 copies of your book in a year; book retails at $10; author royalty is 10%. Your advance would be $10,000 then. Right?

Not necessarily — especially when it comes to celebrities such as Laura Bush.

In my last Publishing Monday post, I covered Laura Bush’s $8 million plus advance for her as-yet-to-be-written memoirs. This post provoked a general outcry of disdain over the amount of money involved since (1) it’s unlikely that Laura will earn out and (2) so many authors feel rudely underpaid.

Shari wrote, “Eight million, huh!… It pays to be a celebrity.” Yup, it paid for Laura Bush. But I don’t envy celebrities, though I do envy book advances of that size. In response to my estimate that it would take 2 to 3 million copies sold to make the deal fiscally sound, Christina commented, “I hadn’t even realized they’d need to sell that many copies of Laura’s memoirs to earn out. WOW.”

Yup, book advances, especially celebrity book advances, are a hot button issue. When I first began my publishing career, I truly believed that all book advances would be negotiated in the method described at the start of this post. (For the sake of this post, let’s call this method the TBAC, for Traditional Book Advance Calculation.) But, as I’ve learned, the publishing world often doesn’t work that way. Like any situation where there’s supply and demand, advances can get pushed beyond what they can reasonably earn out — or dive to less than fair.

Overpaying doesn’t just happen with celebrities. Literary world excitement over a new author can also drive up book deals to stratospheric heights, especially if it goes to auction. (Believe it or not, there are benefits for publishers in overpaying an advance, some which I laid out in my previous Publishing Monday.)

And what about the average author? What can they expect for a first book advance?

Like with celebrity book advances, there are no hard and fast rules: they can range from nada to multi-million dollar figures. Much depends on the following:

1. The book’s publisher. A smaller publisher will usually have smaller pockets to pay out from. Smaller pockets = less room to absorb unearned advances. Larger publishers can often afford to be more generous, and have bigger distribution networks to make sure that book becomes profitable.

2. The book’s market. A book skewed toward a specialized (ie: smaller) market is simply going to sell less copies than a book with a larger market potential. Less potential books sold = smaller advance.

3. Author platform. Though it’s not the same thing, platform bears some similarities to market, and a good platform can translate into market. Laura Bush has one heck of a platform, which Scribner is hoping becomes market share. However, the good news is that you don’t have to be First Lady to have a platform (though it does help to be a celebrity). Are you an expert in your field? Sought after as a speaker? Have a syndicated radio or television show? Take into consideration that platforms often come from unexpected venues. For example, humorist Sharon Glassman’s involvement with Operation Santa led to her having a book published about her experience by Warner Books.

Once you have a publisher interested, what’s the best way to negotiate a fair book advance? If you’re unhappy with what they’re offering, use the TBAC as a starting point. To get a basis for your TBAC, read Publishers Weekly, Galleycat, or Publisher’s Lunch to learn what similar books are selling for. Consult the Authors Guild or SCBWI for children’s books. Get feedback from other authors. My experience is that publishers often offer lowball figures to first time authors; they’ll usually negotiate to a certain extent.

Finally, a good literary agent can most likely get you a better deal than you’d obtain on your own. They’re experts in what the market bears, and what a particular publisher will pay. Even if they didn’t place your manuscript with your publisher, this expertise alone is well worth their 15% commission.

Next week on Publishing Monday, I’ll write about other ways authors are making money from publishers outside of the TBAC. Yup, alternative publishing models!


comments

Lisa Hunt wrote on January 19, 2009 at 8:21 am:

The topic of advances is a contentious one. Some new authors simply want to get published and will do anything to realize that dream. That often means they’ll sign whatever is put in front of them. I know, I’ve heard of it and it’s more common than you may think. Other authors will sacrifice an opportunity/open door and refuse an offer based on principle–I’ve seen that happen too with mixed results and sometimes regret. Here is what I think: it all depends on what YOU want out of the situation. Although I am a big proponent of keeping one’s copyright, I am of the flexible-advances-school-of-thought. The bottom line, no matter how much of an advance, you must earn it back. If there is an opportunity to break into publishing but with little immediate monetary compensation, you have to decide whether it is worth your time or not. I’ve heard some people theorize that a larger advance will assure a stronger PR effort from the publisher. I don’t think this is necessarily true. My best selling product was one that I received a very low advance for–with the benefit of immediate royalties instead. I also think one has to leave one’s ego at the door. This is a competetive field and if a prospective author makes too many demands on the publisher (esp. if it is a small press), they can very well forfeit the very opportunity they had so eagerly sought. I’ve seen this too–and I’ve seen it happen to people who never received an offer again. So my feeling is that there are no fast rules–it all depends on the product, the publisher, the author’s status/experience, and the willingness for both parties to work together. I’ve heard many editors complain about author egos—egos will not assure a larger advance. Being confident and flexible appear to be key. At least it has been for me.

kris waldherr wrote on January 19, 2009 at 9:58 am:

Lisa, I agree with you that the most important point is what the author wants out of the situation. Getting clear on that can save a lot of frustration and time on both sides. Much depends on the publisher’s market, and what the author expects of the book.

One example which immediately comes to mind: In academia, often the publisher holds onto the copyright and doesn’t offer an advance. However, the author needs to “publish or perish.” In cases such as these, getting published is payment enough.

On the other hand, I once had a children’s book editor (no name, but from a well established house) admit to me that she purposefully underpaid a first time author-illustrator for a book advance. She felt it lessened her risk — and that it wouldn’t matter if the book did well or not, so she wasn’t emotionally invested. It was chilling.

Indeed, there are no hard and fast rules.

Ultimately, I think the important thing is knowing who is publishing you, and what you can expect from them. Again, literary agents are wonderful for giving you the 411 on that, as is speaking with other authors. But that’s a subject for another Publishing Monday.

Christina Rodriguez wrote on January 19, 2009 at 10:15 am:

You are right on all counts, Kris. It’s interesting how everyone’s situation is different, and no two publishing experiences are the same.

lisa hunt wrote on January 20, 2009 at 6:53 am:

…and as an addendum, publishers now expect authors to be much more proactive with their own marketing campaigns (a future blog idea?)–something that has been a real revelation for me in the last few years. It used to be, you did the work and left the rest up to marketing. No more. In many cases, authors must create AND advertise in order to remain viable. And some first-time authors are being published just because of their ubiquity in cyberspace. The proliferation of virtual press has changed the playing field for everyone, yet the advances being offered do not reflect these additional requirements for successful publication. It’ll be interesting to see how this will all play out in the coming years. I know I’m working harder than ever because of the technological sweeps that have engaged society! One must do art, write and be web savvy too! There is no way around it.

Sorry, comments are closed.