Creativity Friday: Interview and giveaway with Stephanie Cowell, author of Claude & Camille

For today’s Creativity Friday, I’m thrilled to have as my guest acclaimed historical fiction novelist Stephanie Cowell. Stephanie’s luminous novels feature the passions and struggles as well as the intimate daily world of artists, writers and musicians of the past: Claude Monet half a century before he painted the water lilies (CLAUDE & CAMILLE), the unmarried Mozart choosing between four musical sisters (MARRYING MOZART), Shakespeare leaving his resentful family in Stratford to try make it as a playwright in London (THE PLAYERS). She is currently writing a novel about a much-loved writer from the nineteenth century — but more about that below.

Stephanie was also a guest at the gallery last month as part of our as part of our ongoing Authors at the Gallery series. It was so inspiring to meet her in person! (Her reading is available to watch here.)

My interview today is about her just-released novel, CLAUDE & CAMILLE (Crown Books). CLAUDE & CAMILLE relates the not-so-well-known tragic love story of the young, unknown Claude Monet and his great love and muse Camille Doncieux. I thoroughly enjoyed it and think you will too. So we’re giving away a copy of it to one lucky blog commenter. (Rules are posted after the interview.)

—————————————————–

Kris Waldherr: You’ve mentioned viewing the Impressionist paintings at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City as an inspiration for CLAUDE & CAMILLE. Was there a particular “eureka” moment that led you to discovering the story of Monet’s first wife and muse, Camille Doncieux?

Stephanie Cowell: Well, not, actually! I fell in love with the friendships of the men there. Of course my husband-to-be was with me, his hand on my shoulder (which was a most entrancing feeling as we had just recently met), so the feeling of love was in the air. I had a sense Monet had loved passionately but I don’t remember a picture of Camille there. Someone just told me they had “Women in the Garden.” How could I not recall it? I recall the strong feeling that he was about to fall intensely in love.

KW: CLAUDE & CAMILLE is quite the delectable tearjerker — Camille is such a quicksilver, tragic muse of a character! What was the hardest part about writing about her? What did you find most compelling? Most difficult?

SC: Camille was the most difficult character in the book and the last to develop into a full, complex character. In an early version she was just a sweet young thing from a poverty background, but when I learned her background was upper-class it made a difference. When I was in my early 20’s I knew a few girls, one who kept lying because she wanted to appear fascinating and then didn’t know truth from fiction and a few (me too) who threw away good homes to live in poverty and wash diapers by hand, feeling we were among the genuine people. My editor kept coaxing Camille from me during the editorial stage and she just grew into something we both didn’t expect. Her terror of growing older, her secret letters to an unknown man…that sort of all came to flower (so to speak) towards the end of the writing process.

KW: One of the things I loved about CLAUDE & CAMILLE is the visceral sense of nineteenth century Paris you’ve evoked — the artists’ gatherings with their rough red wine, the scrounging for oil paint, the renting of model’s clothing, and so on. It’s all very La Bohéme. Can you describe your research process? How long did it take? Do you research before you begin to write?

SC: Research takes place before, during and then after in a way. You keep adding things. I love to find bits of daily life and stick them in. I guess I was researching the whole time. Various biographers had different opinions of the characters, and of Camille herself there was very little known at all. I worked with old photographs and paintings and many books. I walked the streets of Paris where Claude had walked and I went to Giverny. At one point in the book, I only had Claude young in the years before he had heard of Giverny (he did not rent that house until he was 43, after Camille dies); a close friend said, “You must go there to see what he became.” And I did and oddly…I felt so proud of him! I murmured under my breath, “Claude, see what you managed to achieve with your work!” I hope no one else heard me.

KW: Before you became a novelist you spent years as a singer and musician — I’m sure this must have been useful to you in your previous novel, MARRYING MOZART. For CLAUDE & CAMILLE, was your arts background helpful when it came to writing about visual artists? Or was it a challenge? Did you find yourself making certain assumptions about their artist process that turned out to be not as applicable as you first thought?

SC: I had grown up with art, with the smell of brushes and the shape of the easel against the window, but I had no gift to paint or draw. I have been fascinated all my life with changing light and shadow and perspective. Light across a field or above a river can send me into tears of joys, as can peeled stucco on an old Italian house. In the winter I watch as the stone drinks the light. So I had seen other painters and one day I went to hang out in the Art Students League where my mother had taught and listened to the conversations. I had a few painter friends read the book to make sure nothing was too off. I understood Claude’s compulsion. As to music, I had sung parts of Mimi and Musetta in La Bohéme and particularly the scene where Mimi loses her key and the young writer and seamstress fall in love in the shabby studio to some of the most glorious music ever written for lovers. I wanted to create that kind of unreasonable passionate love.

KW: Mozart and Monet are such iconic men — it’s hard to imagine them as anything but great artists influencing much of European culture. What similarities did you find writing about Claude Monet and Mozart? Differences?

SC: Oh goodness! Well, they were both very impractical about money; they wanted to live like lower nobility or at least, in Monet’s case, petite bourgeois. They both had compulsions. I think Mozart had more of a sense of humor and was used to presenting himself before kings dressed in gorgeous clothes since the age of six. Mozart’s father devoted himself to him and guided his son’s genius.  And in the 1770’s there were good jobs for musicians/composers. Every good church needed one; every nobleman or archbishop had his orchestra and wanted a new symphony for a wedding or something; they needed new operas like we need new movies (and books, one hopes!)  Monet’s father was against his becoming an artist and by then there were no guaranteed places or incomes for new artists. The photograph had come and all the churches were already painted the century before. And Paris was flooded with a thousand artists. There were very few patrons. Mozart had lots of rich patrons; it took Monet until his forties to find any.

Then of course Mozart was surrounded by the happy family of his wife, even though his father wished he had not married. At thirty he was making a fortune and surrounded  by those who loved him. At thirty Monet was near destitute and about to go into exile to London where thing would be worse.

KW: I’ll ask the same question that I asked Mary Sharrett last month: What advice would you give to writers working on novels (specifically historical fiction)? As the saying goes, hindsight is best sight: What do you wish you knew then that you know now?

SC: I wish I had known how hard it was! I mean, what diligence you need and what a challenge the actual business of writing can be. But I’d say if a writer wants to do this, what a joy it can be! Forming a  few characters, a place, a dish, warm weather, a hat, a quarrel maybe and there is something living on the page. And when someone else reads and loves your story, it is indescribable. I have not quite taken it in…and I can’t really, because each reader has their different ways and reasons for loving a story. It’s a shared intimacy.

KW: I’ve heard that your next book is a novel about the Victorian poet Elizabeth Barrett Browning. What inspired you to feature a female protagonist after several books featuring male historical figures? How has writing this book differ from writing CLAUDE & CAMILLE? And, finally, when can we expect to read it?

SC: I have wanted a female protagonist for a long time. I found it easier to write about men and maybe more fascinating, as I always like to know what makes each one tick! And in historical times when a woman is brilliant, so much of the book is about her defying the system to express herself.  Of course each book is different than another book, but in CLAUDE & CAMILLE, Camille can’t wait to defy her loving patents and live the life she wants; Elizabeth has a hard time even marrying because she does not want to displease her father or desert her family. And their moral standards! I am dealing with Victorians here where propriety is everything, not the Bohemian French world where they live as their hearts tell them.  When will the novel be expected? With good luck it will be in bookstores in two years. We’ll see!!

———————————

Thank you, Stephanie, for an amazing interview! As I mentioned above, Stephanie has generously given us a copy of CLAUDE & CAMILLE to raffle off here. To win it, simply leave a comment by midnight, MAY 20, 2010.

The rules: Only one comment per person. However, to spice things up, for an extra entry tell me who is one of your favorite artists and why. He or she doesn’t have to be an Impressionist or nineteenth century artist. I’ll start off: Though it’s difficult to choose just one, one of my favorite artists is Dante Gabriel Rossetti. Why? Not because he’s such a great draftsman — his drawings are seriously wonky. Nor are many of his later paintings particularly tasteful (Bocca Baciata anyone?). But I can’t resist the over-the-top passion he brought to his paintings and drawings. I’m also enthralled with the stories associated with him and his Pre-Raphaelite cohort.

Small print: Book can only be shipped to U.S. or Canadian mailing address. Winner will be chosen at random and announced here May 21. Good luck to all!

• 8 Responses
• Read comments...
• Comment Feeds